Thursday’s Surgical Consult, And The Plan At The Moment

03.7.2010 | 4:07 pm | Breast Cancer

Thursday’s consult with the local surgeon (Dr R) went very well. I had been anxious beforehand, since I knew that as far as Dr R knew, I was meeting to go over the plans to biopsy the suspicious area…I didn’t know how well he’d react to my saying I’d rather skip the biopsy and go straight to mastectomy instead. Well, he reacted quite positively. He seemed very knowledgable about what’s showing up on mammogram, about DCIS and about my options for reconstruction.

First we went over my history. He marveled over my current left-side recontruction and knew right away what surgeon I’d used in NOLA (the reconstruction technique I underwent in ‘01 was developed by this surgeon in NOLA; his group is world-renowned for this state-of-the-art procedure).

Then he went over the mammogram. First he complimented the film quality—they did “an incredible job” with the mammo, according to him. So if you’re local, I highly recommend Angel Williamson Imaging (in both Pcola & FWB). He said he sees about 6 microcalcifications, clustered together in a linear, branching pattern. The last two terms are highly suspicious for malignancy within the duct. He began by saying that due to their pattern, “we definitely need to take it out”. So I responded by saying, “Actually, what I really want is a mastectomy; I just found out yesterday that my insurance covers prophylactic mastectomy based on history alone, so…” and he interjected with, “Oh, good, then; you already have a plan!” :)

So he agreed that to go ahead with mastectomy was a reasonable treatment plan for both the suspicious area and for my future health. Yessss.

He then added that there’s no way I’ll be able to get “this type” (referring to my left side) of reconstruction done here in the Pcola area. I rightfully assumed this already, but it was nice to hear the confirmation. He confirmed that plastic surgeons in Pcola only do reconstruction with implants—which are absolutely not an option for me. Same as I felt in ‘01, I’d rather have NO reconstruction at all, than implants. He also confirmed that to get the same, autologous (using my own redistributed fat) reconstruction I’d had before, I’d need to return to my surgeons in NOLA, a plan for which he gave his full support and recommendation.

He talked with me for a while about insurance coverage for this type of reconstruction. It’s tricky, I already knew. While insurance does cover reconstruction along with mastectomy, most insurers set limits on the cost, which isn’t a problem with straight implant reconstruction (which is relatively cheap), but this high-tech, autologous/microsurgical reconstruction that my NOLA surgeons do, comes at an immense cost (my total bill in ‘01 was over 100k for the entire surgery/hospital stay). Often insurance reimbusements don’t match the reconstruction surgeons’ cost, but instead of disallowing the difference, many reconstructive surgeons bill the difference to patients…which typically results in 10-30k out of pocket expense for the patient. I have no idea at this point if I’ll run into this scenario now, with my current insurance. This is one of the things we’re waiting to hear word about. Dr. R said that if there is a difference, that I should discuss it with my recon. surgeon, asking for him to write off the difference based on my being a returning patient and, in his words, “an extraordinary patient”. (Not sure what he meant by that, but perhaps it will help me!)
I’ll definitely do this if necessary; my recon. surgeon was a very sweet young man with whom I had a good relationship, so I hope he’d happily do this reconstruction for me, for whatever my insurance offers.

I thought it was nice of Dr. R to sit and talk with me and advise me about trying to get everything set up for surgery to take place in NOLA. What a great Dr! I’d ended up telling him that if we do run into the issue of insurance underpaying and my recon. surgeon not being willing to write off the difference, that there was no way I could pay for the tens of thousands of dollars in order to do it. So if that does end up being the case, I’ll just get a straight mastectomy with no reconstruction, because, again, implants are so not an option. He said that if it came to that, that he’d be happy to work with me and do the mastectomy for me. He was just a really caring, concerned doctor, and I appreciated his support for my plans.

So we ended our discussion with him wishing me luck in setting everything up in NOLA and for getting full insurance coverage for reconstruction. I asked him if delaying surgery for several weeks would be a danger (as far as leaving the suspicious area unchecked until I can get the mastectomy scheduled), and he said absolutely not. That he would be completely comfortable with me waiting a month, or possibly even up to two months until surgery, without any great danger. He did also point out that while the calcifications do point to malignancy, that it’s by far most likely to be intraductal, or, DCIS—which, while not a good thing, is NOT invasive…yet. So that helped me feel a bit less worried about the potential wait. He seemed very knowledgeable, and that along with my prayers for him to have wisdom in my case, makes me feel safe in waiting the necessary weeks until surgery.

Friday we got everything rolling in NOLA by calling my recon. surgeon’s office there (Dr. S). Liz, his patient liason, gathered all my info and started dealing with my insurance immediately to gain preauthorization for surgery. By the end of the day, she’d been in contact with them and said that everything was “going well” with them. She said that while Dr. S & his associates are well-booked, they always find a way to get surgery scheduled within one month if it’s a cancer case. She said I definitely count as a cancer case; even though I don’t have a diagnosis on this area yet, due to both my history and the fact that my surgery will be the biopsy on this area, it counts. Also, my being a return patient enables me to get higher priority, so she said they’ll get me in within a month. So that was a relief…as long as insurance cooperates, I’ll be getting my mastecomy within a month, and I’ll also find out what this area is…which is still a big issue to pray about.

**Please join me in praying that there will be no invasive cancer anywhere in my entire breast, as well as in the lymph node(s) that will be removed & biopsied.
And please pray that my insurance will 1) give NO problems authorizing this surgery right away, and 2) cover the entire recon. surgery bill, OR, that Dr. S will be willing to write off any difference that insurance doesn’t cover.**

I’ll update once we know more about the insurance and whatnot, but for now, that’s where I’m at. I’m just in awe of how God has moved these things in my favor. I couldn’t see how Thursday’s consult with Dr. R would end without confusion or frustration, but it ended in neither. It ended with amazement at yet another positive step being made. So many thanks for the prayers; they’re working. :)


I knew I would end up revisiting this at some point…Well, the time has arrived.

03.7.2010 | 4:03 pm | Breast Cancer

(Sharing this with the bloggy world, in the hope that google searches might lead someone to some helpful info in their own research. It was written as a note, in various entries, so excuse the non-bloggy format. I’ll post future updates in more blog-worthy format.)
So I had my yearly mammo & ultrasound a couple of weeks ago. Dr. W, the radiologist, saw something that warranted me coming in again to have more views done. So I went in and did more xrays, with magnification. I was initially told that day by the mammo tech that Dr. W still saw “changes” and wanted to speak with me (but she’d gone home with the flu, so it was 5 days of waiting before she finally did call me back to discuss what she sees). So fast-forward to this past Tuesday when I finally talked to Dr. W:

She sees some (3 or 4) new microcalcifications showing up around the single calcification I had on my ‘08 mammo (which, BTW, I was not informed about at that ‘08 mammo, a fact that I am furious about and will be following up on with Baptist). For those who don’t know, microcalcifications can be caused by something benign, but they often indicate cancer, especially when concentrated in one spot, because they’re formed by areas of rapid cell turnover.

Dr. W considers the increase in number to be suspicious, She also considers it a suspicious finding due to my “young” age; she said microcalcs are fairly normal in a much older woman, but not at all in the 30-40 age range. Those factors, plus my history, lead her to recommend a biopsy of the area, which of course I’m all for.
She recommends excisional biopsy (complete removal of the suspicious area) rather than the typical needle biopsy, because with a needle biopsy, a benign result doesn’t ever necessarily mean that there is no cancer present, it just means there was no cancer in the random little bit the needle removed. I agree with this 100%, since I know that a needle biopsy would’ve shown a benign result for me in ‘01, because my actual lump was indeed benign…it was the excisional biopsy that got out the extra tissue that did turn out to contain cancerous cells. So bring on the surgery, I say! (with a bit of trepidation, of course.)

I’ve got consultations scheduled with two different surgeons this coming Thursday (Mar 4). One is more of a general surgeon who has some expertise in breast surgery, and the other is a breast specialist who also headed the sentinel node biopsy program at Baptist in our city. I’m obviously leaning toward the 2nd surgeon, but I may keep both appts and see what each says…then choose which one to use once I’ve met and talked with them both. Praying about that decision. Both surgeons will schedule surgery within 1 week of the consult, so I should be having the biopsy within the next 2 weeks.

Now, to pray for the outcome. Please pray that if there is any cancer found, that it will be the NON-INVASIVE, DCIS form that I had last time. Non-invasive is key. Then a mastectomy would be in order, and that would be all I ever have to have done, in order to never face this again. I wouldn’t even have to have mammograms every year anymore; I would be “cured”, since I would be free of breast tissue, and therefore free of any chance of recurrence (well, 98% free).
If there is any invasive cancer, then we’ll be dealing with a whole different ballgame, and I don’t even want to go there. So please, pray that whatever is there, that it is non-invasive. Thanks for all the prayers,

***UPDATE 3/3/10***
Okay, what’s the great news? Well, there’s no news yet on what is brewing in my breast that’s caused the microcalcs on the mammo, BUT…

I found out this morning that our new insurance COVERS prophylactic (preventive) mastectomy under four situations, and one of those situations is if a patient has a personal history of breast cancer! That’s me! And that’s it! That is the open door I’ve been waiting for!
Many policies cover prohylactic mastectomy if a patient tests positive for the BRCA gene mutation (a test I’d wanted done for the sake of hopefully testing positive and therefore being eligible for the mastectomy, but couldn’t front the $3500 it costs), but apparently our insurance actually includes anyone who has simply had any form of breast cancer in the past.
So I’m eligible for 100% coverage (after our deductible) for the preventive mastectomy I’ve wanted for years!

I have the appointment to consult with the surgeon tomorrow at 3:30. It’s supposed to be a consult for the recommended biopsy, but I’m going to tell him that I want a preventive mastectomy instead. Assuming he’s on board with that (a very few surgeons still think it’s too aggressive of an approach, but most don’t, and even those who do will still do it for an informed and willing patient, which I am), he will start the process of gaining pre-authorization from my insurance, which I was told today would be just a matter of paperwork and confirming that I do indeed have a history of breast cancer that makes me eligible for coverage. Once the process is begun, I will have a mastectomy as soon as it can be scheduled, and my entire breast (along with 1 or 2 sentinel nodes) would be biopsied and checked over for any sign of cancer, either DCIS like I had on the left side, or invasive (which I pray will be absent). So the mastectomy would then become the “biopsy” I need anyway, but will allow me to skip the biopsy-only step. I hope this makes sense.
Basically, I’ve planned all along to get a preventive mastectomy on my remaining breast; I just wanted to have my 2 kids first and to breastfeed them. AND, I had to find a way to get it covered by insurance, which I NOW HAVE, to my great surprise! This is such an answer to prayer. Of course now I ask for prayer that the surgeon will be immediately on board, the process will begin immediately, and that it will go smoothly to get me this surgery FAST–I’m worried about what’s in there and want it out as soon as possible.